Incomparable

One shudders to think what was going through the mind of those judges who had to decide which was the best film for the foreign Oscar this year.

Would it be that piece of paternalistic claptrap in which a Danish doctor helps the starving black masses, or would it be a masterpiece like Biutiful or the apparently brilliant Dogtooth from Greece -or Incendies, a Canadian film which stays with you like a dream that is so disturbing and important that it doesn’t have to be written down.

The judges obviously settled for In a Better World with its comfortable, anti-Muslim view of Africa just dying to be helped by a good bwana. But there is nothing comfortable about Incendies, which roughly means scorched, having just finished at the New Zealand International Film Festival and coming to cinemas next month.

It's a devastating metaphor for the Middle East, but the judges probably didn't like the fact that it's finger isn't pointed at Muslims this time, but Christians. As if it matters, for God's sake. Fanaticism is fanaticism.

What starts off as a slightly strange reading of a will in a Canadian notary’s office leads us slowly and surely  into a maze of horror in the Lebanese south that, as one character later on says, it would be better not to know about. But by then we are so far into this journey, so mesmerized, that we can’t let go.

To say what exactly the film is “about” would be doing it a great disservice, not because it would be spoiling the plot but because the subject matter is so delicate and can so easily sound trite – or sensational - that it would cheapen it.

Director Denis Villeneuve steers his actors through this emotional labyrinth with a sober, steady hand, using no fancy lighting, and gets performances that are breathtaking. It would be almost unfair to single anyone out, but Lubna Azabal’s performance as the central character is so good that her haunted look, like that dream, will not go away.

If at the beginning we might think she’s having a slightly over-dramatic moment at a public swimming pool, when we finally know why it seems like an act of superhuman restraint. How can she not burst, let alone live, having been through so much?

One of the great ironies of the film is that “civilized” Canada is shown as dark, cold, rainy and sterile, whereas rural Lebanon is depicted as sunny and passionate – but rotten with religious and moral depravity. As for those who think film cannot convey depth,complexity and catharsis, here's proof to the contrary.

See this film if you want to know what’s happening in the Middle East, from whatever point of view. It’s all the same. But its greatest accomplishment is that if the audience was making audible sounds of disbelief and horror, not one of us left. We couldn’t. It’s too vital, like a Greek tragedy, to walk away from or to avoid.

Incendies has to be seen. Period.

Neil Sonnekus

Knock, Knock, Who's There?

The New Zealand International Film Festival only really starts today, so I had to decide what to review before a host of mainly foreign, not-such-mainstream movies hit Auckland.

It was a toss-up between Robert Redford’s two-hour-long history drama, The Conspirator, or Unknown, another Liam Neeson Euro-thriller, out on DVD now.

Redford’s drama didn’t seem to have much to do with contemporary matters like the trials of the Guantanamo Bay prisoners in a way that Arthur Miller’s The Crucible echoed the McCarthy anti-communist witch-hunts, so I decided to go with Unknown at the shorter “approximately 109 minutes”.

Neeson’s previous outing in Taken had him as a retired American special agent tracking down his teenage daughter, who gets abducted in Paris, and saving her from those throat-slitting damned Ayrabs. It was a really slick thriller and quietly racist too.

Now Dr Martin Harris (Neeson) and his wife, Elizabeth (January Jones), go to Berlin to attend a biotechnology conference, but when they get to a fancy hotel he realizes he’s forgotten his briefcase at the airport and catches a taxi back there without telling his wife. He’ll call her, he thinks, but – ta, da – his phone’s been disconnected. Something’s up. The music tells us thus.

Before you can say Sturm und Drang the taxi crashes and he knocks his head badly, but fortunately Diane Kruger is the taxi driver and saves him from the city’s icy river. Now, however, nobody believes that he is who he says and thinks he is. Cool idea. This could be good.

When Harris does finally track down the able taxi driver, Gina (Kruger), she avoids him like the plague because she is a gastarbeiter who doesn’t have her papers in order, but her one colleague, Biko (Clint Dyer), will play the nice black guy who can always be relied upon in these situations. Biko? Look, it’s not unusual to name your children after this or that hero, but a little context might have helped. Anyway, Biko goes the way of all nice, reliable black helpers.

One of the big clues in the movie is that this scientist turns out to be quite able with his fists and driving skills, but the best lines are given to veteran Swiss actor Bruno Ganz playing an ex-Stasi official. “We Germans are very good at forgetting. We forgot the war, we forgot forty years of communism…”

At least he doesn’t have to contend with Harris’s line to him: “I need you to help me prove I’m…me.” You can see Neeson had to do that one quite a few times. He seemed to be grimacing too when he asked Gina whether he could "crash" at her place. You could just imagine a typical Germanic response. "But we've crashed already once, why again?" But then she is Croatian and they know exactly what that old Sixties word stands for.  

Things are not what they seem, of course, and when Frank Langella’s Rodney Cole visits Ganz’s Ernst Jürgen it becomes the best scene in the movie, fraught with tension and a clever surprise by cleverly  echoing what Joseph Goebbels and Martin Bormann allegedly did in the same city, circa May 1945.

Don’t read further if you don't want more plot giveaways, because Harris turns out to be an…assassin, whose knock on the head actually had him believing he was really married to Liz, loved her and was a biotechnologist. It’s all been a brilliant set-up, or such are the attractions of the bourgeoisie.

Now Harris, who has killed numerous others, suddenly decides to save a German scientist who is about to give the world free, pesticide-resistant grain - with the generous backing of an Arab prince, almost as if to make up for that other bit of anti-Muslim filmmaking.

So you see what a knock to the head can do for you. You can change your personality, get exonerated for all the people you killed and then hop on to the bullet train with a new identity and great-looking blonde babe as the end credits start rolling. Simple.

Neil Sonnekus

Fudged French Farce

Francois Ozon’s mystery-thriller Swimming Pool had a lot going for it. It had the incomparably sexy Charlotte Rampling facing off against a much younger woman and winning in ways the latter couldn't even begin to imagine. 

Starting off as a power play it ended up as metaphor for a writer’s reality, which can best be illustrated by another famous French writer on his deathbed, enquiring after the wellbeing of one of his fictional creations.

Another Ozon film, 8 Women, was set in the Fifties and had eight of the top French actresses of the time working out who murdered a man they were all related to in one way or another. Catherine Deneuve, Isabelle Huppert, Fanny Ardant and Emmanuelle Beart were four of those women.

But what made the film unusual was the fact that they would variously burst into song every now and again.

Ozon clearly likes working with women and vice versa, and in Potiche he teams up with Deneuve again. This one is set in the Seventies and starts off with the 67-year-old housewife jogging along a country road in a red tracksuit – and curlers. She is well-off housewife Suzanne Pujol, who also jots down poems, which are excruciatingly bad. We soon learn that she is a compliant trophy wife, une potiche.

Her husband, Robert (Fabrice Luchini), is a typical bourgeois boor. He married her so that he could get his grubby little hands on her father’s umbrella factory and have an affair with his younger, busty secretary. But the workers are giving him such uphill that he has a heart attack and Madame Pujol takes over, agreeing with and to many of the workers’ demands.

Helping her is an old flame, the socialist MP and mayor of the town, Maurice (a very corpulent Gerard Depardieu). Will they restart their old love? Is her son possibly his?

From being a suburban goddess Mrs Pujol becomes a flag bearer for women in the workplace, which is all very well, but she seems to have sentimental leanings towards the way her father did business, which was to give your worker a gold watch and a signed photograph of yourself after years of loyal service as a farewell present. Seriously.

But this is supposed to be a farce. Luchini’s character doesn’t quite crack the modern equivalent of a Molierian miser, which is not his fault. Yes, the ever elegant Deneuve could be a metaphor for, say, a contemporary Christine Lagarde, but Deneuve has never done poker-faced French comedy, let alone maternal warmth, very well.

So there’s very little to laugh out loud about in this rather long attempt to send up the French bourgeoisie. This could be because it’s taking its own, not exactly new or sophisticated political message way too seriously.

Neil Sonnekus

* Next week this time the New Zealand International Film Festival begins.

You Talking to Me?

Enough of all this arty-fartsy, namby-pamby, hoity-toity, Marxy-parksy kind of stuff. Let’s get down to some low down and dirty Joe Bob Briggs territory for a change.

You know, how many explosions, decapitations, bullets, litres of fake blood, real breasts, fake breasts, hotpants, sex scenes - the whole drill - can we see.

Well, B-grade specialist Robert Rodriguez (El Mariachi) doesn’t disappoint, but then I’ve always thought he’s much more of an artist than his better-known pal, Quentin Tarantino.

Anyway, you just want to get into the aesthetics of the first New Mexico shot when a rundown car with our hero and a fellow Fed drives into frame and within seconds loyalties are affirmed and heads lose theirs to various thugs’ bodies.

Our hero,who is the closest thing we've got to Charles Bronson these days, doesn’t believe in guns when he can use the old slice,stab and twist technique – and he likes talking about his own myth in the third person. Danny Trejo as Machete Cortez performs the bad acting of the exploitation movies this one’s based upon down to a T, if you know what I mean and I think you do.

So does Robert de Niro, though whether Lindsay Lohan and Steven Seagal are actually trying to act badly is moot. The only thing one can say about him is that he’s very big, and she only comes to life once she’s in a nun’s garb and packing some pouting blonde heat. Being naked and stoned on screen is too much like real life, so that doesn’t count.

But the interesting thing is that there is, in fact, quite a serious theme underlying all of this. Mexicans want to get into America for a better life, God help them, and the Feds want to stop them. The drug lords want to help the Feds by erecting a huge wall, but for their own perverse reasons. They know that as much as the desperadoes want to get in, so does much of the American population want its drugs from down south to filter through.

Put up a wall and it chases up the price of narcotics and the lords sit pretty - which is exactly what the war on them seems to be doing anyway.

Moreover, anyone vaguely interested in how a movie is made could do worse than to marvel at how this one is put together. It’s got a good grungy soundtrack, fresh Mojave-Catholic visuals, a tongue firmly in its cheek - “and introducing Don Johnson” - and has such a good rhythm that it breathes like some heaving, sweating organism.

Like its long-haired, middle-aged peasant hero, in fact.

Moreover, it was made for $10-million and earned $14-million on its opening weekend. This could be because there’s plenty of blood, guns, crucifixes, hot rods, motorbikes and female flesh to be seen – though not much for the women, as it should be.

At first I was puzzled that Rodriguez prissily faded to black every time he got to a sex scene, but then it dawned on me that the whole film is legit porn anyway. I therefore have no hesitation in pronouncing Machete* a masterpiece.

Neil Sonnekus

* Out on DVD now.

The Manor Maketh the Man

Kahukura by Robyn Kahukiwa

Ever since he won the screenplay Oscar for his somewhat populous Gosford Park in 2001, it seems like screenwriter Julian Fellowes has been making to-the-manner-born TV series and films. Truth is, he also co-writes stuff like the dire The Tourist, but never mind.

His supreme achievement, in my humble opinion, is a series that has just ended. The first season of Downton Abbey has left me somewhat breathless. Another eight episodes have been commissioned and I can’t wait, partially because I can watch it at home and shout at my children if they eat sweets as noisily as people do here in cinemas.

But why is it so good? Partially because it at least acknowledges that British society did not (it is set just before the Great War) and does not merely consists of the rich, royal, famous and boring. 

Robert Crawley, the Earl of Grantham (Hugh Bonneville), runs the manor and seems to spend most of his time being humane to his many servants, who have lives and secrets of their own. The rest of his time is spent being run by his three daughters.

Oddly, in Fellowes’ current feature film, From Time to Time, Bonneville appears as a humane captain at sea who brings a friend home for his blind daughter. That friend is black and his wife, a Dutch woman (Carice van Houten), is outraged. She rather likes gambling, which is rather un-Dutch, but never mind again.

But the big glue in both instances is Maggie Smith. In Abbey she can turn the most innocuous line into a comic feast of irony, ambiguity and manipulation. In the final episode the manor gets a telephone and electricity and Violet, Dowager Countess of Grantham, says she feels like she’s living in an HG Wells novel as if nothing could possibly be worse.

In the feature film (as people crinkle their lolly papers), a young boy visits his granny (Smith) and awaits his father’s return from World War Two. But he can see ghosts from the past and it turns out to be a good old fashioned spook mystery. It’s also shot a bit like a dusty novel from before the war, but one constantly has to remind oneself that Smith is playing a nice old lady here, not Violet.

In the series she is simply magnificent.

What we want to know in it, of course, and among many others, is who is going to inherit the bloody manor; are Lady Mary Crawley (Michelle Dockery) and her solicitor cousin Matthew Crawley (Dan Stevens) going to finally get together; is the enigmatic butler John Bates (Brendan Coyle) going to stop being so bloody honourable and marry the maid Anna (Joanne Froggat); and are the nasty toff, Lady Edith Crawley (Laura Carmichael), wicked (and gay) first footman Thomas (Rob James-Collier) and scheming Irish maid Sarah O’Brien (Siobhan Finneran) going to get their comeuppance?

And those are just some of the plots; there are many more.

But the main reasons why the series works so well is because it is set in a real manor, not a TV studio acting as New York; and it is exceptionally well written, directed and acted, easily accommodating no less than 16 main characters. It will not survive a Marxist reading, even though one of the drivers is a socialist, but it is still class entertainment, pun fully intended.

In the meantime, we’ll have to do with the breathless excitement (not to mention unintended comedy) of David Attenborough’s First Life on Sunday Night Prime. At 85 the man is unstoppable.

*

 

The featured screenprint's title is the Maori name for the red admiral butterfly. It's part of a Native New Zealand series artist Kahukiwa has been doing over the last 10 years in various media. Most of the images, she says, feature Maori women with native flora and fauna.

 

Neil Sonnekus

And Now, Ladies and Gentlemen...

Even if you haven’t seen or heard Joan Rivers live or recorded, and I hadn’t, if you’re of a certain age you would have heard or read about her. She has a reputation.

You know she’s known for being vulgar and brash: over the top. So when the doco on her life, A Piece of Work, came out on DVD recently, it was time to find out who exactly the woman is.

Made over the course of her 75th year, she often talks directly to the camera and gives us a portrait of herself as much as the industry in which she works. It’s not a pretty picture.

We learn that she was Johnny Carson’s favourite person until she got her own show to rival his, after which he never spoke to her again.

Ever.

We see her manager and best friend drop her like a ton of bricks for no apparent reason in the course of that year. We’d expect her to take it in her stride, thanks to her reputation, and she does. But she’s also genuinely devastated.

It’s not nice being betrayed, especially not when you’re getting on. But then the old girl has a fighting spirit and almost pathological need to work and be loved. We get to find out how her husband cracked after a bad deal and committed suicide, leaving her and her daughter to carry on by themselves.

But is this pure hagiography by directors Ricki Stern and Anne Sundberg? Well, not quite. They don't mind showing us that her show bombs in London and she will therefore not put it on in New York. If they clearly love their subject matter they don’t mind including Ms Rivers ending up in Wisconsin – such is her need to carry on working - to give a show for a bunch of Bible thumpers.

A man in the audience tells her her joke about disability isn’t funny: he has a deaf son. She curses him and tells him about her deaf mother and late husband. “Where the fuck would we be if we couldn’t laugh about 9/11?” she retorts. Applause. Talk about turning the moral majority around.

Deeply insecure, she even endures grating jokes about her many, many plastic surgery ops on live TV shows – as long as she can be seen. Then again, on Thanksgiving Day she dispenses food to the needy and visits a once-famous photographer, Flo Fox, who is now incapacitated by multiple sclerosis.

So it’s a pretty comprehensive, warts-and-all portrait of Joan Rivers, I'd say. She’s a piece of work alright. And she's a mensch.

Neil Sonnekus

Duddy Revisited, Sort of

The dominant memory I think most people have of The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz (1974) is Richard Dreyfuss’s immense energy, informed by huge doses of chutzpah.

Apparently Dreyfuss thought his debut-feature performance was the end of his career, but he was thankfully wrong.

There was also the famous scene in which avant-garde film-maker Friar, played to drunken, dissolute perfection by the late Denholm Elliott, makes a video for the ambitious Duddy’s company, which specialises in bar mitzvahs.

According to one site he intercuts African dances and circumcision rites in his work of “art”. I seem to remember him using World War ll themes with screaming German Stukas. Maybe that was included, maybe it’s another movie. These are the tricks memory plays on us.

Anyway, Barney’s Version has very much the same feel. Our protagonist is still in the film business, running a company called Totally Unnecessary Productions. He also has an important male figure who my old man would have called a “character”. Dustin Hoffman just gets less mannered and therefore better and his slightly corrupt, retired cop and father Izzy is a pleasure to behold.

But then the whole thing teems with memorable characters, though Africans might be offended that the one person who gets no continuity happens to be black. If he gets Barney’s first wife pregnant and gets a deserved whack for it, then Scott Speedman’s drunken, drugged-up writer shtups Barney’s second wife but our dubious hero remains loyal to him. Just saying…

Barney is a hard-drinking, perpetual cigar-smoking, ice hockey-loving, capitalist, Jewish Canadian. The big secret to his character is his passion, his chutzpah because, let’s face it, the portly and hirsute Paul Giamatti is not exactly leading-man material.

Granted, he has to play Barney from about 25 to 65, and he did get his Golden Globe for that, but whether the beautiful and slim Rosamund Pike’s Miriam would be as attracted to and tolerant of him as she is, level-headed though her radio announcer persona might be, is debatable. And if she is so tolerant of his many vices, why then does she leave him and their children for a single lapse of discretion by Barney?

Lastly, what other version is there? The one in which a detective tries to prove that Barney actually murdered that useless writer friend of his? It's not a really developed version, though it takes a delicious swipe at the media for getting the story all cock-eyed.

If the film is never boring, often hilarious and a rich tapestry of characters and mores, then it's a sometimes uneven echo of  Duddy - and it requires a little suspension of romantic disbelief.

Neil Sonnekus